10 Tips for Accurate Court Recording with Voice Recognition

10 Tips for Accurate Court Recording with Voice Recognition
10 Tips for Accurate Court Recording with Voice Recognition
As the reform of court recording continues to advance
Audio and video recording is prioritized over traditional transcription in court proceedings
How can the parties involved participate effectively
To optimize the recording results of court proceedings
Let’s dive into
Tips for Participants

Article Overview

1. After the court recording reform, how to participate in court proceedings correctly?

1. Maintain a quiet environment

2. Follow court instructions

3. Stay close to the microphone

2. Using “voice recognition” to record court proceedings, how to improve accuracy?

4. Clear phrasing

5. Clear references

6. Read numbers clearly

7. Translate foreign languages

3. How to effectively express opinions, to enhance court efficiency?

8. Structure arguments with focus

9. Submit written opinions

10. Reuse signatures

After the court recording reform

How to participate in court proceedings correctly?

01

Maintain a quiet environment

The court recording reform utilizes intelligent voice recognition technology, which requires a high standard for the environment. All parties involved must maintain silence in the courtroom. Whether inside or outside the court, loud talking or noise should be avoided.

Personal devices such as mobile phones and laptops should be set to silent and placed away from the microphone to prevent signal issues that may affect audio and video recording.

Observers should also adhere to this rule and refrain from speaking or making noise.

02

Follow court instructions

In court proceedings that utilize the reform method, following court instructions and adhering to the order of speaking is significantly more important than in traditional court. If a party does not comply with court instructions and disrupts others, it can lead to misinterpretation and ambiguity.

If a party needs to speak at an unexpected moment, they should raise their hand to request permission and write down their thoughts on paper. The court will arrange a speaking opportunity at an appropriate time. If interruptions occur, the interrupted party should restate their complete sentence instead of continuing from where they were interrupted to avoid confusion.

03

Stay close to the microphone

Parties involved should check the screen before the court proceedings to confirm whether the microphone is on. If there are any issues, they should promptly inform the judge or clerk for resolution.

In proceedings utilizing the reform method, the microphone is a crucial tool, so parties should try to stay close to the microphone before each speaking turn. The microphone’s position can be adjusted, allowing participants to move closer to it. Once the microphone is set, participants should not change positions or microphones.

If there are multiple microphones at the seat, there is no need to point multiple microphones at oneself. If it is not your turn to speak, you may move away from the microphone.

When others are speaking, if discussion is needed, keep away from the microphone.

Using “voice recognition” to record court proceedings

How to improve accuracy?

04

Clear phrasing

During court proceedings, speech should be clearly phrased. There should be appropriate pauses at the end of sentences and not prolonged pauses in the middle of thoughts, as this can mislead the system and affect transcription accuracy. The system may have slight delays but maintains integrity, so participants should not continue speaking immediately after the transcription is complete.

05

Clear references

Identifying names is a weak point in the court recording reform system, but using clear reference terms such as appellant, respondent, plaintiff, defendant, etc., can significantly improve transcription clarity and understanding.

Additionally, if a party has established shorthand references, they can inform the court beforehand to set hot words to help the system improve transcription accuracy.

06

Read numbers clearly

When reading numbers, there is no need to specify the digit places. For example, 12,345.68 should be read as: one two three four five point six eight. This applies to case numbers, request numbers, and logical sequences; reading numbers sequentially leads to excellent transcription results.

07

Translate foreign languages

During court proceedings, participants should speak in Mandarin. Currently, the court recording reform system can only recognize Chinese and cannot process other languages. If it is necessary to state words in other languages, it is advisable to provide a brief explanation of the meaning in Chinese before or after the statement to avoid ambiguity.

How to effectively express opinions

to enhance court efficiency?

08

Structure arguments with focus

Before expressing opinions, participants should clarify the key points and determine the structure of their statements, focusing on layered arguments. Practice has shown that directly explaining the logical order, stating key points, and clearly articulating opinions can significantly enhance the readability of the transcription. Using sequential words like first, second, third, etc., can indicate the beginning and end of the semantic content for the court recording reform system.

09

Submit written opinions

When preparing written opinions, participants can provide key hot words to the court. Written opinions should be submitted to the judge’s assistant or clerk before the court session, with hot words indicated. Effectively inputting hot words before the session can proactively assist the court recording reform system and enhance transcription accuracy. If the transcription does not meet expectations after the session, written opinions can also be submitted to clarify relevant content.

10

Reuse signatures

Before the court session starts, all parties typically sign the “Notice and Confirmation of Audio and Video Recording Replacing Court Transcription”.

After the court session ends, a signature is required on the system-generated “Metadata Table”. Signature methods vary by court; for example, in Shanghai’s First Intermediate People’s Court, the signature board is set up at the clerk’s seat, and the judge’s assistant or clerk will arrange for orderly signatures after the session. If parties agree to “reuse signatures,” they can leave the court directly after the judge announces the adjournment, thus improving efficiency.

Further Reading

What is the court recording reform?

10 Tips for Accurate Court Recording with Voice Recognition
The court recording reform refers to the use of blockchain evidence storage, intelligent voice recognition for real-time transcription, and full audio and video recording, based on relevant regulations and with the consent of the parties involved, prioritizing audio and video recording to fully or partially replace traditional court transcription to enhance the authenticity, accuracy, and completeness of court records, thereby better adhering to principles of equality, integrity, disposition, and debate in litigation.
As of now, the court recording reform can apply to both offline and online court sessions, mainly divided into three models:
1. The clerk is completely absent, with full audio and video recording and intelligent voice recognition generating the court text record;
2. The clerk completes preparatory work and then leaves the courtroom;
3. The clerk is present to assist and make real-time corrections to the transcribed material.
The specific model used is determined by the judge.
When utilizing the court recording reform method, after the court session, a metadata record table will be generated in real-time, with the hash fingerprint serving as a unique verification code in blockchain evidence storage, ensuring that the court metadata files are not tampered with afterward.
Furthermore, although there are no paper transcripts for such cases, audio and video recordings can serve as verification evidence. If parties need to review the transcripts, they can request the court to burn the audio and video onto a disc.
In fact, not only Chinese courts are exploring the use of audio and video recordings to replace manual records; a study by the National Center for State Courts (NCSC) in the United States indicates that several states use audio or video equipment to replace court clerks. In 2009, Utah eliminated court clerks, saving $1.3 million annually, while digital court records saved Iowa courts $10 million annually on court clerk expenses. Therefore, funding and cost issues are significant factors for states in the U.S. choosing to use audio and video recordings instead of clerks.

Leave a Comment