Advanced strategies for protecting the originality of papers with Claude, avoiding crossing the red line.
Today, Ajiu will share how to use Claude to assist in paper writing while avoiding the impact of AI-generated content on paper originality.
Through helping hundreds of doctoral and master’s students solve paper problems, Ajiu has summarized a 4+1 model, which consists of 4 key techniques and 1 core thinking.
This model has helped many students successfully pass paper plagiarism checks and reviews.
Speaking of this, Ajiu can’t help but recall the experience of a doctoral student last week.
He used a generic method to let Claude generate content directly, and as a result, his advisor immediately recognized it as AI-written.
Later, he followed Ajiu’s method to rework it, and not only did he pass the plagiarism check, but even his advisor praised the depth and thoroughness of the writing.
This made Ajiu even more confident in the reliability of this method.
First, let’s talk about the 4 key techniques: the first technique is the reverse deconstruction method.
Rather than letting Claude generate content directly, input your research conclusions and let it deduce possible argument paths.
This way, the generated content will be more in line with academic logic because it is based on your original conclusions.
In practice, first input your research conclusions to Claude, then ask it to list the arguments and derivation steps needed to prove this conclusion.
This way, the resulting framework will be more persuasive and avoids directly adopting AI-generated conclusions.
The second technique is the phrase group restructuring method.
Instead of having Claude generate complete paragraphs directly, let it help you reorganize language elements.
For example, you can input: “Please help me reorganize the following academic viewpoints into a coherent paragraph: innovation-driven, industrial upgrading, technological breakthroughs, market demand.”
Ajiu recently prepared a detailed phrase group restructuring template library for core members, which includes various restructuring ideas and practical cases for different sections of papers. Interested students can consult Ajiu for details.
The third technique is the viewpoint collision method.
Let Claude play the role of scholars from different schools to challenge and debate your arguments.
This not only helps identify loopholes in the arguments but also provides multi-dimensional perspectives for thinking.
Specifically, you can input: “Please evaluate and question my viewpoint from the perspectives of positivism and constructivism.”
By organizing these different perspectives, your paper will appear more objective and comprehensive.
The fourth technique is the literature deconstruction mirroring method.
Find 3-5 high-level references, let Claude help you analyze their writing logic and argumentation methods, and then use a similar framework to organize your content.
You can ask Claude: “Please analyze the argumentation levels and writing strategies of this literature, and help me organize my research content using a similar structure.”
This maintains academic standards while allowing you to learn from the writing characteristics of excellent literature.
Finally, let’s talk about the 1 in this model, which is the core thinking: always treat Claude as an assistant rather than an author.
Its role is to help you organize your thoughts and optimize your expression, not to write for you.
This reminds Ajiu of another case.
A master’s student complained that after using Claude, she couldn’t write articles, the reason being excessive reliance on AI-generated content.
Later, she changed her mindset and treated Claude as a discussion partner, brainstorming, researching literature, and organizing frameworks daily, and finally successfully completed her thesis.
When using these techniques, always remember to input your core viewpoints and key arguments first.
Just like Ajiu often emphasizes to core members: let Claude work around your thoughts, rather than being led by it.
The first step is always to determine your research position, then use the reverse deconstruction method to build the framework.
Next, use the phrase group restructuring method to optimize expression, and then complete the argumentation through the viewpoint collision method.
Finally, use the literature deconstruction mirroring method to ensure writing norms.
—————–
PS. How to obtain “one-on-one scientific research consulting guidance” or “latest academic AI model accounts” and watch Ajiu’s “advanced techniques for internal paper research”?
The exclusive advanced Claude application course “Ajiu teaches you how to use AI” and the directly usable Claude account pool in China, as well as better Claude accounts are all here. Note “Claude” will pass friendly within 10 minutes.
